Even though it’s been almost 15 years since Dr. Melzack developed the
Neuromatrix theory of pain, a good amount of clinicians still focus treatment of
chronic pain with a very patho-mechanical approach to chronic pain treatment.
Many patients can get a bad taste in their mouth when it comes to PT when they
are pushed through stretches and exercises that they feel can be harmful to
their wellbeing and will cause them pain. As a growing field of evidence based
practitioners, physical therapy needs to move beyond this. Thankfully the
neuromatrix model of pain and researchers that have utilized its concepts have
given us ways to do so.
For those who may not know, the neuromatrix model of pain portrays the
complicated intertwining of different areas of our nervous system, mind, and
body and the influence this has on pain and pain perception. Its development was
brought about during the research of phantom limb pain in patients with
amputation that couldn’t be explained by pathomechnical models. The inputs into
the nueromatrix include Cognitive (memories of past experience, attention,
anxiety, depression), Sensory (cutaneous input, visceral input, visual,
musculoskeletal), and Motivational-affective (limbic system, associated
homeostasis/stress mechanisms). The important broad message of this is that pain
is not purely a sensory, musculoskeletal input. It is interpreted by the brain
and therefore the affective and cognitive inputs can have a very dramatic input.
Any clinician who has treated patients with chronic pain has likely treated
someone with anxiety, depression, PTSD and the like with chronic, global pain
that doesn’t “make sense” by a pure musculoskeletal explanation, or may be
ongoing years after an injury should have been healed by the body. This is a
great example of the different inputs effects on what our CNS interprets as
pain.
The importance of the neuromatrix and understanding the different inputs and
their influence on a patient’s pain is that we generally need to treat more than
muscles and joints to help these patients on a path to healing. Much research
has been done to show the effect on pain education on patients’ pain levels. In
a systematic review of 6 studies published December 2011, Louw, et al. found
that Neurocience education had significant positive influences on both pain
levels and function/disability. Additionally, another article by Louw and
Puentedura found that educational sessions on pain science helped to change
patients’ conception of the role of physical therapy in treating chronic pain
and shift it to a more positive view. As a clinician and neuro-musculoskeletal
expert, it is the physical therapist’s job to explain the way our brain
influences and perceives pain and injury, the effect of peripheral and central
sensitization of pain, and ways we can change the neurophysiology to work in our
favor. Patient education should be done in easy to understand terms, often using
analogies and metaphors in a low educational level. The gathered evidence shows
that the more the patient understands about their pain and what is happening in
their body, the more positive the effect.
Educating a patient on pain, neurophysiology and neurobiology in easy to
understand ways is an effective tool for decreasing the negative inputs into the
neuromatrix, resulting into a positive shift in pain perception. Getting
patients to understand that pain is not just an injury, or threat of injury, to
tissue, but also is associated with nervous system sensitivities, past
experiences, and psychosocial differences will compliment exercise and manual
therapy approaches to pain treatment. Additional resources, as well as
educational tools, can be found through the Neuro Orthopaedic Institute (http://www.noigroup.com/en/Home),
and The International Spine and Pain Institute (https://www.ispinstitute.com),
two excellent organizations that I am not affiliated with.
Last revised: April 22, 2015
by Bill Lyon, PT, DPT, CSCS, USAW-L1
References
Louw, A., Diener, I., Butler, D., Puentedura, E., The effect of neuroscience
education on pain, disability, anxiety, and stress in chronic
musculoskeletal pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2011;92(12): 2041-2056
Louw, A., Puentedura, E. Therapeutic neuroscience education, pain,
physiotherapy, and the pain neuromatrix. International Journal of Health
Sciences. 2014;2(3): 33-45
Melzack, R. Pain and the neuromatrix in the brain. Journal of Dental
Education, 2001:65(12):1378-1382
Melzack, R. Evolution of the neuromatrix theory of pain. The Prithvi Raj
Lecture: Presented at the Third World Congress of World Institute of Pain,
Barcelona 2004. Pain Practice. 2005:5(2):85-94
Moseley, G.L. A pain neuromatrix approach to patients with chronic pain.
Manual therapy. 2003;8(3): 130-140
|