Advertisement  
   Forum Home CyberPT Home Page      
Forum Home Forum Home > Specialty Forum for PTs/Healthcare Professionals > Wound Care
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Evidence base practice for treating wounds with WP
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Evidence base practice for treating wounds with WP

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Previous CPT Forum View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: Jun 24 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 131
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Previous CPT Forum Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Evidence base practice for treating wounds with WP
    Posted: Jul 08 2008 at 3:04pm

rizzopt

1 Posts
 
Posted - 01/29/2008 :  19:30:20  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Can anyone recommend some literature for the use of whirlpool for treating wounds vs pulse lavage, dressing change etc.. ?

Darin

2 Posts
 
Posted - 03/05/2008 :  21:53:16  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
You can perform a lit search for the studies, but you will find that there is little supporting evidence for the use of whirlpools in wound healing. There are many studies that show an increased risk of cross contamination and biofilms, which is why whirlpools are rarely used these days. Pulsed lavage is nice for those larger wounds that need the suction, but there are also reports of cross contamination with the splashing/small droplets in the air...which is why many pulsed lavage manufacturers now sell this tent type thing to prevent it. The use of a wound cleanser via spray bottle or large syringe is much easier, cost effective, and quicker in most cases. Also, use of Vacuum assisted closure (VAC) is extremely effective once the wound is granulating well. I continue to be amazed at wound healing rates when using the VAC.

Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.03
Copyright ©2001-2015 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.250 seconds.